TV film crew reckon they've found Yeti footprints in the Himalayas
Skunk Ape has written 286 stories on this site.
ofcourse bigfoot is real
no living creature has such a foot. It is just a hoarx. The film crew needed such a find to justify all the money they spent.
How about the fact that people in the himalayas are getting so much less oxygen then the are at sea level that their brains just aren’t functioning properly and therefore they’re just hallucinating, or also very likely are seeing people in the distance who are covered in snow that are dying from pulmonary edema and struggling to breathe and mistaking for one of these imaginary creatures?
There are such things as yetis, big foots, umpa lumpas!!!!!!
look people if yetis, big foot, etc. were real, we would already know it.
i think that’s everest
yo encontre al yeti pero en san andreas en mount chilliad
Americanos o “policía del mundo”, dejad de tragaros todo lo ke dice la tele antes de colgar gilipolleces en youtube, de lo que por cierto también deberéis aprender a no creer.
they is at least as stupider-est as are that comment
this is possibly a promotion or ad.
the himalayas are vast. theres something there for sure
That Destination Truth show, and its makers, is so superficially stupid.
was that hashish.
is that mount kailash?
It’s real for sure.
bah i dont believe it … yup–
Omg they have made a mistake!!! its not a yeti it was just my mum crossing the mountains..
dis is bullshit
yeti; bob saget!!!! thare on to me loch ness thare on to us!!!.Loch ness; let’s het out of heare you —-en sachwach.yeti; don’t you say thing’s about my brother Lock ness;let’s take this outside lad yeti; we are outside lockness;you win this round —-h
What? He said science is factual proof of the world. The Big Bang isn’t fact, and yet it is scientific. Science isn’t FACTUAL proof of the world. It’s just evidence.
no shit sherlock!
God dont create the world
hahaha 1:04 wild hairy Queachas
The notion that “if Sasquatch exists, we would already know it” is not necessarily true. Gorillas were reported by the indigenous people of Africa long before they were discovered by westerners. In fact, gorillas were not “officially” discovered until the later 1800′s; around 1847-1859.
So, how is that any different from the past and current reports of Sasquatch? If the creatures are intelligent, as most presume, they would be much harder to find given their ability to avoid human contact. Also, the heavily wooded and mountainous regions that sightings have taken place in are so vast and covered, anyone could easily hide from someone looking for them. I don’t think it’s absurd or unimaginable to believe that an unknown species of primate could live in that kind of habitat.
What’s a shame is that there are people who lie about sightings and/or falsify evidence and complicate the process of getting to the truth of the matter for researchers who are looking for very logical and sound scientific truths. But, for all of the verified hoaxes there is still a good amount of evidence that cannot be explained as false. I believe that there is already enough evidence to support the existence of such creatures and it will only be a matter of time before we have enough solid proof to shut the mouths of the skeptics for good.
Enter your name and email to receive updates: