Yeti Footprints Found In Himalayas

TV film crew reckon they've found Yeti footprints in the Himalayas

Rate This Article:
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

About the Author

has written 286 stories on this site.

26 Comments on “Yeti Footprints Found In Himalayas”

  • brandonzyee wrote on 25 March, 2010, 4:32

    ofcourse bigfoot is real

  • ruzickaw wrote on 25 March, 2010, 4:43

    no living creature has such a foot. It is just a hoarx. The film crew needed such a find to justify all the money they spent.

  • fjeffrey10 wrote on 25 March, 2010, 5:30

    How about the fact that people in the himalayas are getting so much less oxygen then the are at sea level that their brains just aren’t functioning properly and therefore they’re just hallucinating, or also very likely are seeing people in the distance who are covered in snow that are dying from pulmonary edema and struggling to breathe and mistaking for one of these imaginary creatures?

  • FoozLuv wrote on 25 March, 2010, 5:37

    There are such things as yetis, big foots, umpa lumpas!!!!!!

  • MusicFreakG wrote on 25 March, 2010, 6:23

    look people if yetis, big foot, etc. were real, we would already know it.

  • zorilaz wrote on 25 March, 2010, 6:47

    i think that’s everest

  • rodrigoisay wrote on 25 March, 2010, 7:16

    yo encontre al yeti pero en san andreas en mount chilliad

  • Nostra88 wrote on 25 March, 2010, 8:01

    Americanos o “policía del mundo”, dejad de tragaros todo lo ke dice la tele antes de colgar gilipolleces en youtube, de lo que por cierto también deberéis aprender a no creer.

  • stuetrory wrote on 25 March, 2010, 8:41

    they is at least as stupider-est as are that comment

  • ososturk wrote on 25 March, 2010, 9:28

    this is possibly a promotion or ad.

  • CYMRUTUBE wrote on 25 March, 2010, 10:13

    the himalayas are vast. theres something there for sure

  • komodoman wrote on 25 March, 2010, 10:22

    That Destination Truth show, and its makers, is so superficially stupid.

  • baileysbay wrote on 25 March, 2010, 11:17

    was that hashish.
    great discovery

  • amsbeats wrote on 25 March, 2010, 11:43

    is that mount kailash?

  • bj616 wrote on 25 March, 2010, 12:09

    It’s real for sure.

  • IAMTHECAPSGODLOL wrote on 25 March, 2010, 13:05


    or……… WOODPINS

    wait wat

  • b2ftube wrote on 25 March, 2010, 13:52


  • Dune1884 wrote on 25 March, 2010, 14:25

    bah i dont believe it … yup–

  • ToyWhip wrote on 25 March, 2010, 14:40

    Omg they have made a mistake!!! its not a yeti it was just my mum crossing the mountains..

  • keayl17 wrote on 25 March, 2010, 15:33

    dis is bullshit

  • landons2 wrote on 25 March, 2010, 15:51

    yeti; bob saget!!!! thare on to me loch ness thare on to us!!!.Loch ness; let’s het out of heare you —-en sachwach.yeti; don’t you say thing’s about my brother Lock ness;let’s take this outside lad yeti; we are outside lockness;you win this round —-h

  • PivotScourge wrote on 25 March, 2010, 15:55

    What? He said science is factual proof of the world. The Big Bang isn’t fact, and yet it is scientific. Science isn’t FACTUAL proof of the world. It’s just evidence.

  • bringmemybow wrote on 25 March, 2010, 16:04

    no shit sherlock!

  • Carolcarolcarol12 wrote on 25 March, 2010, 16:32

    God dont create the world :D

  • sixfiguredrumer wrote on 25 March, 2010, 16:56

    hahaha 1:04 wild hairy Queachas

  • Mellow Monster wrote on 6 April, 2010, 17:34

    The notion that “if Sasquatch exists, we would already know it” is not necessarily true. Gorillas were reported by the indigenous people of Africa long before they were discovered by westerners. In fact, gorillas were not “officially” discovered until the later 1800′s; around 1847-1859.

    So, how is that any different from the past and current reports of Sasquatch? If the creatures are intelligent, as most presume, they would be much harder to find given their ability to avoid human contact. Also, the heavily wooded and mountainous regions that sightings have taken place in are so vast and covered, anyone could easily hide from someone looking for them. I don’t think it’s absurd or unimaginable to believe that an unknown species of primate could live in that kind of habitat.

    What’s a shame is that there are people who lie about sightings and/or falsify evidence and complicate the process of getting to the truth of the matter for researchers who are looking for very logical and sound scientific truths. But, for all of the verified hoaxes there is still a good amount of evidence that cannot be explained as false. I believe that there is already enough evidence to support the existence of such creatures and it will only be a matter of time before we have enough solid proof to shut the mouths of the skeptics for good.

Write a Comment


  © 1998-2017 Copyright Florida Skunk Ape, LLC. All rights reserved.  |  Privacy Policy  |  EULA
  Web site development and hosting services provided by SiteDoodle.